BTC officials charged in unprecedented scandal
By
Sharan Kumar
In
an unprecedented event in the history of Indian racing, the Chairman of the
Bangalore Turf Club, Aravinda Raghavan, its Secretary, M. K. Kiran, and betting
ring supervisor, Vijay Narasimha, have been charge-sheeted by the Central Crime
Branch (SE) along with 87 others. The charges are under Sections 406, 409, 420,
120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 78(1)(a), (I), and
78(2) of the Karnataka Police Act 1963.
The
charge sheet indicates that accused numbers 1 to 27 are on anticipatory bail,
28 to 84, 86, and 88 are on station bail, while accused numbers 85, and 89 to
91 have not been arrested. Vijay Narasimha is identified as A89, M. K. Kiran as
A90, and Aravinda Raghavan as A91.
Following
the police charge sheet, the Bangalore Turf Club has revoked the licenses of
the involved bookmakers. However, the Club has remained silent on whether the
Secretary and Chairman, also named in the charge sheet, will be asked to resign
despite the severity of the charges. By cutting ties with the accused
bookmakers and their associates to strengthen its position, the Club has put
itself in a precarious situation, seemingly ignoring its significant
involvement and thus jeopardizing its chances.
In
a previous incident involving the Queen Latifa case, the BTC Board, which
included government nominees, requested the resignation of the then Chief
Stipendiary Steward, Pradyumna Singh, following a CID charge sheet.
The
charges include accusations of Bangalore Turf Club (BTC) officials' involvement
in illegal betting and assisting bookmakers in evading taxes owed to the
government. Despite being aware of the illegal betting activities, the BTC
Administrative Board has taken no action, effectively colluding with licensed
bookmakers and permitting the continuation of illegal betting.
The
police obtained a search warrant to investigate the BTC administrative office
and other premises. Rs 3,45,74,040 was seized from various stalls during the
raid, with accounts not properly maintained. Prima facie, the police believe
there is collusion among BTC officials.
The
I ACMM, in his order, noted that after reviewing the complaint, mahazar
statement, and witness testimonies, there is sufficient material to take
cognizance under various sections of the Karnataka Police Act 1963.
Consequently, a case has been registered against Accused Nos. 1 to 91 in
Register No. III. Summons have been issued to all accused, and the case is
scheduled for further orders on June 10, 2024.
The
charge sheet highlights the absence of essential documents related to betting,
including tax invoices, tax invoice registers, and account books. Betting cards
were not legally obtained, and the betting records were kept in a manner only
understood by the bookmakers with significantly understated amounts. The GST
paid was only a fraction of the amount collected, and no 30 per cent TDS was
collected. No records were produced during the raids.
The
charge sheets expose numerous serious discrepancies and explicitly allege
collusion by BTC officials. The chargesheet highlights the fact that the
bookmakers show lesser income than the amount they pay to run their stalls!
A
total of approximately 50 police officers were involved in the operation at the
BTC premises, and statements from about 60 witnesses were taken. The bookmakers
appealed to the High Court of Karnataka to quash the CCB's actions, questioning
their authority to handle GST-related matters. However, the High Court
dismissed the petition, stating that the charges prima facie appears very grave
and granted the police the authority to proceed.
Following
these raids, the Government of Karnataka has suspended the license given to the
Bangalore Turf Club to conduct its activities since April 1. The BTC approached
the High Court for relief and the matter is to come on June 6. The Court has
directed the government to come up with its reply about giving license to the
club. The Bangalore Summer Season has been considerably delayed and the
stakeholders have been put to much hardship by the shenanigans of the
mandarins of the BTC.
When
someone approaches the court, they should do so with clean hands. Given that
the petitioner, the Secretary of the Club, and the Chairman are facing serious
charges, is the court informed of this fact? Especially in cases involving
equity, the court typically requires disclosure of all relevant facts,
including any charges or accusations against the petitioner. This ensures the
court has a complete understanding of the situation and can make a fair
decision.
The
BTC has left many crucial questions hanging in the courtroom.
Comments
Post a Comment