BTC’s Bold Resolutions on a Legless Stool

 

By Sharan Kumar

 

The Bangalore Turf Club (BTC) has passed a series of resolutions at its Extraordinary General Meeting held on Saturday, each laden with ambitions of relocation, continued occupation, financial concessions, and administrative authorisations. On paper, it looks like a club attempting to take charge of its destiny. But scratch beneath the surface, and the exercise begins to resemble a grand illusion of authority, one that the Government of Karnataka is unlikely to entertain.

 

For decades, BTC has functioned under the belief that its heritage, influence, and contribution to the city’s social life give it a certain bargaining power. That belief may have felt true in a different era. But in 2025, with no lease on the land it occupies, no legal claim over the 60+ acres on Race Course Road, and a complete dependency on the government for its license, utilities, and operational permissions, the club is trying to negotiate from a position that barely exists. It is, to put it gently, a body sitting on a stool with no legs, convinced it is seated on a throne.

 

The resolutions passed by the club reinforce this miscalculation. BTC seeks permission to continue racing at the present site until an alternative location is ready. It wants concessions on rent. It wants stamp duty waivers. It wants financial support during the transition. It wants the government to honour terms, timelines, and administrative conveniences that only an equal party in a negotiation could demand. But BTC is not an equal party and the government knows this better than anyone else.

 

At present, the club occupies government land without a valid lease. Its operations continue at the pleasure of the state, subject to annual licensing and political goodwill. The explanatory statements annexed to the EGM notice themselves acknowledge that the government has repeatedly communicated its intention to relocate the racecourse. The club has no enforceable contractual right to insist otherwise. Yet the resolutions, in their tone and content, are structured as though BTC has bargaining leverage it demonstrably lacks.

 

Governments do not respond kindly to wish lists. They respond even less kindly to entities that overestimate their negotiating position. BTC’s resolutions read like demands framed as requests, an approach that almost guarantees they will be “taken on record” and quietly disregarded. The government’s stance on relocation is firm, consistent, and legally defensible. BTC’s stance is hopeful, verbose, and anchored more in sentiment than in statute.

 

The club’s leadership may genuinely believe they are safeguarding members’ interests by passing elaborate resolutions filled with clauses, authorisations, and conditional permissions. In reality, they have merely formalised the disconnect between their aspirations and their circumstances. The government is under no obligation to grant even a fraction of what has been sought. And unless BTC recognises that it is negotiating from the ground, not the saddle, it risks being brushed aside in the bureaucratic breeze.

 

If the intention of the EGM was to strengthen BTC’s position, the outcome has been quite the opposite. The resolutions expose a club still operating with an outdated sense of self-importance, unaware that its authority rests on borrowed ground, literally and figuratively. Unless BTC adopts a pragmatic, humble, cooperative strategy acknowledging the government’s dominion, its resolutions will continue to be little more than paper exercises, destined to gather dust in a Secretariat file.

 

One has to wait and see whether the government takes kindly to these resolutions, which read less like polite requests and more like outright demands. The timing could not be worse. The government is navigating its own internal crisis, with the Chief Minister under pressure from a deputy eyeing his chair. Known for his rigidity, he is unlikely to be amused or indulgent when confronted with BTC’s assertive wish-list.

 

In the end, the uncomfortable truth remains: no resolution can stand firm when the institution that passed it has no legs to stand on.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The enduring charm of the Bangalore Derby

I never thought that I would become a full-time racing writer when I set out as a journalist in the year 1980. My passion for cricket was what drove me to become a sports journalist. If there are many converts like me in the field of horse racing, you can blame it on the enduring charm of the Derby. Most people come to the Derby because they hear so much about it. Many of them stay back and I was one of them.   The first time I attended any race day was the running of the 1984 Derby. Eddy Cracknell trained Lively Empery was one of the highest priced runners in the fray. The horse reportedly was for sale much before the Derby. Luckily for the trainer it remained unsold and the horse went on to win the Summer Derby as well as the Winter Derby in the hands of Alan Mercer. It won the Derby at odds of 100 to 1.   Legend has it that the current leading trainer Padmanabhan told one of his owners to buy the horse and that he would win the Derby with this horse. The owner was n...
Read more

Rajan Bala, one of a rare kind

Image
One of the finest cricketer writers that India has seen, Rajan Bala, passed away in Bangalore on Friday (October 9) after brief illness. He was truly an inspirational journalist for a generation of sports writers in the country in a career spanning about four decades. I began my career as a sports journalist in Deccan Herald of which he was the Sports Editor. I worked under him later in Indian Express as well though at that time he was stationed in Chennai. He then moved to Mumbai and also had a stint with an eveninger. He returned to Bangalore in the last decade with the intention of retiring from active journalism and keep himself occupied by writing columns for newspapers. But he soon landed another job, this time as the Resident Editor of Bangalore edition of Asian Age and he made me write a column on horse racing. He later became a columnist for Bangalore Mirror and joined a TV company as a consultant editor and yet again, he made me participate in a panel discussion on horse rac...
Read more
Are the British government betting restrictions on the money?   By Rolf Johnson   I’m jumping the gun. The Government’s Gambling Review  might  publish its findings on 17 April but as deadlines for its publication have come and gone over three yawning years, I don’t think there’s need to hold one’s breath long enough to asphyxiate oneself. The delay has nothing to do, we are assured, with the £378,000 that fifty-seven Members of Parliament have received since the last election in hospitality, gifts, donations and wages from bookmakers. The integrity of that largesse has been “checked” though whether as rigorously as it is intended the public’s betting habits are going to be, we’ll have to be patient – until April 17 at least. Theatre audiences continue to attend playwright Samuel Beckett’s 1981 masterpiece ‘Waiting for Godot’ whose message is that repeated nonsensical actions demonstrate man’s inability to give meaning to life. Heavy stuff: but the Gambling Commissio...
Read more