Court Signals Green Light for Coexistence
By Sharan Kumar
In a legal reprieve that could well become a blueprint
for racing clubs across the country, the Madras Race Club (MRC) has secured
temporary relief from closure of racing activities, with the Madras High Court
suggesting that a racecourse and an eco-park need not be mutually exclusive.
The court posed a pertinent question: Why can’t both co-exist? — a
sentiment that echoes a growing belief that these historic spaces, occupying
prime real estate, can serve dual purposes.
The court has now adjourned the case to August 18 to
allow both MRC and the Tamil Nadu government to file additional documents. More
crucially, it confirmed that the trial — including cross-examinations — must
conclude by March 31, 2026, effectively ensuring that the racing season
commencing this August can proceed without disruption. The National Green
Tribunal’s (NGT) interim stay on development activities at the 118-acre Guindy
property was also acknowledged during the hearing.
The club’s legal strategy—citing the successful
Mahalakshmi Racecourse model in Mumbai, where the racecourse and public park
co-exist—appears to have struck a chord with the judiciary. The court, while hearing
the state’s argument that the lease stood cancelled in public interest, urged
the parties to explore coexistence as a practical and constructive solution. The
MRC counsel however insisted that the premises is still in rightful possession
of the club.
It may be recalled that the Tamil Nadu government had
abruptly terminated the MRC’s lease, which was valid for another 30 years,
citing plans to develop an eco-park with a water body. Negotiations for
relocating the club to Hosur faltered midway, pushing MRC to seek judicial
redress. Meanwhile, the NGT brought another layer of complexity by asserting
that restoring a lake at the site was of greater ecological importance than
constructing an eco-park—underscoring the imperative of groundwater conservation.
This situation presents not just a challenge but a
golden opportunity for turf authorities. Turf clubs operating on government
land must acknowledge the growing public demand for accessible green spaces.
Instead of maintaining a fortress-like presence, they could open their space
for public use—walking, jogging, leisure—without compromising the integrity of
racing.
The Royal Western India Turf Club has already set a
precedent. By voluntarily surrendering a portion of land for an eco-park, RWITC
secured a 30-year lease extension and even received approval to build a swanky
new clubhouse in a previously disused area to generate additional revenue in
these hard times. Such foresight in accommodating public interest has helped
the Mumbai club strengthen its relationship with both the government and the
community.
By contrast, the Bangalore Turf Club remains locked in
a protracted legal battle over land ownership after losing its case in the High
Court. The matter is now in the Supreme Court. The Karnataka government has
proposed relocating the club to Kunigal while reportedly offering a portion of
land at the existing location for a clubhouse and betting operations. Here
again, if the club were to develop the open space into a community-friendly
park with walking tracks and lighting, it could pre-empt further confrontation
and earn goodwill.
The cost of developing an entirely new racecourse is
now prohibitively high, and the returns are unlikely to justify the
investment. Around the world, even established racecourses are shutting down
due to dwindling patronage and competition from other forms of entertainment.
In this context, clubs like the financially strained Bangalore Turf Club and,
to a lesser extent, the Madras Race Club are in no position to undertake such
capital-heavy ventures. It is far more financially prudent to retain racing
at existing urban tracks—which already have legacy, infrastructure, and
access—while developing training centres on the outskirts. This hybrid
model not only reduces the pressure on prime urban land but also helps
clubs stay relevant and sustainable in a changing environment. Simply put,
building new racecourses is no longer a viable option.
If turf clubs can shed the image of being elite
enclaves and open their gates to the public in meaningful ways, they not only
safeguard their future but also embed themselves in the fabric of the city.
It’s no longer a question of survival—it’s a question of relevance. And the
path forward may well begin with a simple gesture: inviting the public in for a
walk.
Comments
Post a Comment